ReneKMueller.com: Computer Diary *

Here my little rant and praise place, where the daily experiences of my programming work are expressed. I publish them with the idea that others might find it useful and benefit from it.

Tag <VMWare Fusion>

Check also other posts with other tags.

2009/02/24
VirtualBox vs VMWare Fusion on MacOSX
last edited 2009/03/23 20:28 (*)
I require to test some of my web-sites with IE6 and IE7, unfortunately. For that reason I began to use open source VirtualBox.org (2.1.4), and compared it with the trial version of VMWare Fusion (2.0.2) for MacOSX:

VirtualBox
Fast install, WindowsXP SP2 CD I have is for corporate installs, no enter of serial - once installed (apprx. 20min) it boots, and I upgrade from IE6 to IE7. I duplicate the disks beforehand using VBoxManage, just cp the .vmdk doesn't work, you require to use that helper program.
I booted the guest system with Kubuntu 8.1 (Linux) a few times, after 4 days, the VirtualBox guest didn't boot anymore, not even the BIOS splash screen showed up, blank guest screen. I had to . . . reboot the host machine, then the Virtual Box worked again - not really convincing. As I found out, and pointed out, VirtualBox on MacOSX as host seems a bit behind stability of VirtualBox Linux host.

VMWare Fusion
Install goes not as seamless as with VBox, I end up entering the serial by hand, finally it booted into XP. It appears faster, has nice feature of "Unity" where the root window of the desktop of Windows XP is hidden, and the application window of IE6 or FF3 appear as application window on the MacOSX desktop, nice feature I thought. But after 1-2 hours using it, the virtual machine became slower and slower, in particular when I started two VMware instances, one IE6 and another with IE7, it slowed down the host machine so much, it almost became unuseable and unresponsive, while top didn't reveal who the culprit was, no huge cpu load neither swap busyness. That wasn't convincing, so I dropped VMware Fusion.
Site Note: vmware.com is one of the worst web-sites I discovered the last months or years, the site is full of links leading "404 - page not found", and uses third party web-sites, like for feedback, which do not work, incredible. High end virtualization software, but a bad web-site to sell it . . . incredible.
Tags: VirtualBox.org, VMWare Fusion, Kubuntu, Internet Explorer, Review | Permalink

Check also other posts with other tags.

[ post new entry ] (only for administators)

Title:

Text:

Tags: (separated by commas)

Date (optional):

Password:

Topics
Kubuntu (5)
MacOSX (4)
UNIX (4)
Lighttpd (3)
Linux (3)
AdBlock Plus (2)
Android (2)
Dell (2)
Firefox (2)
Geonames (2)
Google (2)
MaraDNS (2)
Metadata (2)
Perl (2)
Sqlite (2)
VirtualBox.org (2)
Cellphone (1)
VirtualBox.org (1)
!Flickr (1)
!GoogleMaps (1)
!GPS (1)
Advertisement (1)
AFP (1)
Amrok (1)
Apache2 (1)
App Store (1)
Benchmark (1)
Beta Software (1)
Big Brother (1)
Bind9 (1)
Blackberry (1)
Bloatware (1)
Catch 22 (1)
Cellphone (1)
Cellphone Networks (1)
CGI (1)
Collaboration (1)
Crap (1)
Cygwin (1)
DNS (1)
Donations (1)
DVD/HDD Recorder (1)
Ethics (1)
EXIF (1)
Eye Candy (1)
FastCGI (1)
FUSE (1)
GeoLite (1)
Geotagging (1)
Gestures (1)
GMail (1)
Grep (1)
Hassle (1)
Heuristics (1)
iDeneb (1)
IMAP (1)
Insanity (1)
Internet Explorer (1)
iPhone (1)
iTunes Alike (1)
JavaScript (1)
KDE (1)
Keyboard Mapping (1)
Kinect (1)
Laptop (1)
Location Lookup (1)
LXC (1)
MacOS-X (1)
MacPorts.org (1)
Markup (1)
Medion Life (1)
Memory Waste (1)
MetaFS (1)
Micropayment (1)
NoGREP (1)
Not Ready (1)
NSD (1)
NTFS (1)
Objective-C (1)
Old Laptop (1)
Open Source Software (1)
OpenStreetMap (1)
Opera (1)
Paypal (1)
PhoneGap (1)
QuickConnect (1)
Rant (1)
Review (1)
Server Farm (1)
Servers (1)
Smartphone (1)
Systemic Limitation (1)
Thieves (1)
Thunderbird (1)
Ubuntu (1)
Useability (1)
Virtualization (1)
VMWare Fusion (1)
WebServer (1)
Windows 7 (1)
Windows XP (1)
XBMC (1)
XML (1)

.:.